WALUMBWA RETRACTION WATCH

This article says Walumbwa has eight retractions in total, but I can only identify seven five in Leadership Quarterly, and one apiece in the Journal of Organizational Behaviour and the Journal of Operations Management. After lawsuit, university releases misconduct report about nutrition researcher Chandra. After the retractions as a result of fake peer review amongst others in and that involved Tumor Biology, the decision was made to screen new papers before they are released to production. The authors and editor did agree that an addendum would be useful to clarify some matters, which did not in any way challenge the findings of the article, and those clarifications were what was published in the addendum …. So where is the remaining one to be found? That rapid disposal has caused problems for him — but how long should researchers hang onto data?

There is another side of this issue of authors suggesting reviewers. Learn how your comment data is processed. Continue reading Leadership journal to retract five papers from FIU scholar. The current retractions are not a new case of integrity breach but are the result of a deeper manual investigation which became necessary after our previous retractions from Tumor Biology in Three retracted papers in The LQ, with comprehensive retraction notices. A formal retraction will be published in an upcoming issue. Implications for future research and practice conclude the paper. We will update this post if we hear back.

I hope somebody will look into the possible link to an editing company — and, crucially, whether the authors were aware of what the company was doing or offering to do. The authors provide this addendum to the following article to provide corrections to the results reported and further explanation of the structural equation modeling techniques utilized …. By using this form you agree with the storage and handling of your waulmbwa by this website per the terms of our privacy policy: Are they saying that the statistics were basically made up?

With this latest batch of retractions, the total number of papers retracted for fake reviews is now around Follow Follow this blog Get every new post delivered right to your inbox.

The Leadership Quarterly24 1: The paper is one of four by the pair of co-authors flagged on PubPeer for potential image duplication. Springer is retracting papers from one journal after discovering they had been accepted with fake peer reviews. In fact, they might even try as hard as possible to avoid publishing retractions — only not to further climb up the list.

  MISTERYO CHANNEL 11 EPISODE 2014

Ed, I agree with your sentiment but just wish that more senior members of the field with your stature made these points. SAGE entered into a contract with the society in December with an agreement that the editorial board would be re-structured and there would be a complete overhaul of the peer review processes of the journal to bring it in line with SAGE practices.

Learn how your comment data is processed. Walumbwa, a co-author on the five respective articles, has requested that readers be informed that he was responsible for the analyses. In a letter to board members of the journal obtained by Retraction Watch, Leanne Atwatersenior editor of the LQtiptoed around the reason for the pending retractions:.

Here is the current list click here for walujbwa detailed information about our methodology and additional notes: This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. I always hate it when journals ask me to suggest reviewers fortunately, in my area, most do not. Walumbwa is currently based at Florida International University.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply Your email address will not be published.

walumbwa – Retraction Watch

The big opening for fraud is asking authors for contact info for reviewers, and the fix is obvious and simple: Now a days huge number of rehraction and bogus research articles are published worldwide. Follow Follow this blog Get every new post delivered right to your inbox.

Thanks for your comment. Follow Follow this blog Get every new post delivered right to your inbox.

Management researcher with 7 retractions issues “clarifications” to 2013 paper

The spokesperson explained how the journal plans to prevent future incidents of faked reviews: Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email. This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. The journal is now published by SAGE. A correlation coefficient is usually computed in SPSS with pairwise deletion based on all data available for each pair of variables. Fred Walumbwa — has an incredible set of skills, including prolific writing, ground-breaking research, innovative thinking and the ability to transform good leaders to great leaders.

  CINEMA MALL BANEASA FILME

In the case of the two articles listed above, published online on 22 August in Wiley Online Library, and in Volume 64, pp. The majority of Dr.

Who has the most retractions? Introducing the Retraction Watch leaderboard – Retraction Watch

Bitter rheumatology authorship dispute ends in retraction. Publication from France commented on at Pubpeer: During the study, teenagers with and without progressive scoliosis underwent a physical examination and participated in an interview along with a parent, with the goal of trying to uncover risk factors for the condition.

I was a department head for a few years, and I became familiar with the website when an upset faculty member asked why everyone else in the department got paid so much more than this individual. Fred Walumbwa — has an incredible set of skills, including prolific writing, ground-breaking research, innovative thinking and the ability to transform good leaders to great leaders.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply Your email address will not be published.

Who has the most retractions? Introducing the Retraction Watch leaderboard

I am a sitting editor for Scientific Reports. The scholar, Fred O. With the addition of Dr. Why do you think this is a contradiction? We feel it is important for our readership to be aware of potential issues with the results reported in this article.

Continue reading Ethics committee asks journal to retract paper about controversial growth-stunting treatment. Follow Follow this blog Get every new post delivered right to your walumwa. His co-authors on this all have very good reputations in the field; my hunch is that they were absolutely unaware of any wrongdoing.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply Your email address will not be published.